Celebration of Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion
Standards
Promotion is meant to signify the university’s acknowledgement of advancing contributions to teaching, research (scholarly activity) and academic administration. It should not be viewed as an acknowledgement of long-term service, although such service is deeply appreciated by the college and our learners.
One Faculty refers to MD, PhD, and academic program (AP) appointments
- Standards for Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion in the College of Medicine apply to all faculty with the most recent set always used to assess promotion to any rank
- Checklists of criteria summaries:
- The time period under consideration for promotion ends on June 30 of the year you apply. The starting date is determined by the date of your appointment at your current rank:
- Assistant Professor – the date of your appointment to faculty
- Associate Professor or Clinical Associate Professor – the date you were promoted to that rank
- Faculty interested should first discuss with their Department/Provincial Head
Curriculum Vitae
- Faculty should update their CV annually. Although you may not be going forward for promotion, it is recommended that you send an updated CV to your Department Head.
- The CV should be formatted following the USask guidelines and can be generated in either a Word document or from the USask UnivRS system.
Teaching Dossier
- A Teaching Dossier provides a comprehensive overview of teaching and related activities, teaching development and philosophy of teaching
- CoM teaching dossier template (medical faculty)
- CoM teaching dossier template (scientists)
- Guidelines to consider in preparation of a teaching philosophy
- Contact Faculty Engagement for samples to assist with the process
Case File
- You are required to write several ‘statements’ about your academic progress in various work categories and an up-to-date CV is mandatory. Review these helpful documents:
Timelines
Date | Promotion Process for Faculty |
by June 15 | Candidate advises Department Head of decision to seek or not seek promotion |
by Aug. 1 | Candidate provides case file information in support of promotion to Department Head |
by Oct. 21 | Departmental Promotions Committee shall consider case and make recommendation to the College Review Committee |
by Dec. 7 | College Review Committee shall consider case and make recommendation to the University Review Committee |
by Feb. 15 | The University Review Committee considers all cases and submits its recommendations to the President for transmission to the Board of Governors |
by March 31 | The President advises all candidates of the decision of the Board |
Peer Evaluation of Teaching
Peer evaluations will be coordinated by the Department Head (or designates) and will require consultation with the candidate. For tenure and/or promotion, assessment of teaching performance will be based on a series of evaluations of a candidate’s teaching performance and teaching materials over a period of time. Evaluations, both peer and student, will be obtained on an ongoing basis and should be shared with candidates for formative purposes.
More information is available on the Office of the Vice-Provost, Faculty Relations website.